vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $745.1M, roughly 1.4× Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.). Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs 5.0%, a 11.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.3% vs -2.5%). CHART INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($66.2M vs $-64.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. operates a network of premium athletic, fitness and wellness destinations across the United States. It offers diverse services including state-of-the-art gym facilities, group exercise classes, personal training, spa treatments, nutrition coaching, youth programs and co-working spaces for consumers pursuing holistic healthy lifestyles.
GTLS vs LTH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $745.1M |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $123.0M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 17.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 16.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | 231.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $745.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $782.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $761.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $706.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $663.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $693.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $667.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $950.7M | $596.7M |
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $123.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $102.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $72.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $76.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $37.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $52.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3M | $24.9M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 49.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 47.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | 47.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 48.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | 46.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | 46.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | 46.1% |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | $204.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $8.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | 0.48× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $204.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $175.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $120.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.9M | $18.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | $7.1B |
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.87× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $239.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | $-64.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 40.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 1.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | $-21.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $239.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $195.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $183.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $163.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $170.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-95.1M | $90.4M |
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $-64.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $41.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.2M | $-66.4M |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | -11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 40.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 26.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 1.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 2.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | 2.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 4.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 3.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | 3.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.42× | 3.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
LTH
| Membership | $535.1M | 72% |
| In Center | $191.2M | 26% |
| Other | $18.8M | 3% |
