vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $692.4M, roughly 1.6× OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC). OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs 5.0%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.6% vs -2.5%). CHART INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($66.2M vs $-76.5M). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.
GTLS vs OII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $692.4M |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $36.1M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | -28.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $692.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $668.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $742.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $698.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $713.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $679.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $668.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $177.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | $488.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $695.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $504.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $488.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $487.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $907.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $842.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $773.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $698.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $651.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | $-76.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | -11.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $221.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $128.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-76.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $46.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $-106.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $94.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $29.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | -1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
OII
Segment breakdown not available.
