vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and Public Storage (PSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Public Storage is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). Public Storage runs the higher net margin — 41.7% vs 5.0%, a 36.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Public Storage posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.3% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 2.5%).

Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.

Public Storage, headquartered in Glendale, California, is a real estate investment trust that invests in self storage. It is the largest brand of self-storage services in the US and owns approximately 9% of the self storage square footage in the U.S. As of December 31, 2024, the company operated 3,073 self-storage facilities containing an aggregate of 221 million net rentable square feet of space.

GTLS vs PSA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PSA
PSA
1.1× larger
PSA
$1.2B
$1.1B
GTLS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PSA
PSA
+5.7% gap
PSA
3.3%
-2.5%
GTLS
Higher net margin
PSA
PSA
36.7% more per $
PSA
41.7%
5.0%
GTLS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GTLS
GTLS
Annualised
GTLS
6.6%
2.5%
PSA

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Revenue
$1.1B
$1.2B
Net Profit
$53.6M
$507.1M
Gross Margin
33.3%
Operating Margin
11.6%
40.7%
Net Margin
5.0%
41.7%
Revenue YoY
-2.5%
3.3%
Net Profit YoY
-32.7%
-17.5%
EPS (diluted)
$1.06
$2.59

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.0B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.0B
$1.2B
Q1 24
$950.7M
$1.2B
Net Profit
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
$53.6M
$507.1M
Q3 25
$-138.5M
$511.1M
Q2 25
$76.1M
$358.4M
Q1 25
$49.5M
$407.8M
Q4 24
$79.6M
$614.6M
Q3 24
$69.0M
$430.3M
Q2 24
$58.6M
$518.1M
Q1 24
$11.3M
$508.9M
Gross Margin
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
33.3%
Q3 25
34.1%
Q2 25
33.6%
Q1 25
33.9%
Q4 24
33.6%
Q3 24
34.1%
Q2 24
33.8%
Q1 24
31.8%
Operating Margin
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
11.6%
40.7%
Q3 25
-8.0%
42.3%
Q2 25
15.7%
30.4%
Q1 25
15.2%
34.8%
Q4 24
17.0%
52.4%
Q3 24
16.8%
36.7%
Q2 24
16.1%
44.6%
Q1 24
11.9%
44.3%
Net Margin
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
5.0%
41.7%
Q3 25
-12.6%
41.8%
Q2 25
7.0%
29.8%
Q1 25
4.9%
34.5%
Q4 24
7.2%
52.2%
Q3 24
6.5%
36.2%
Q2 24
5.6%
44.2%
Q1 24
1.2%
44.0%
EPS (diluted)
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
$1.06
$2.59
Q3 25
$-3.23
$2.62
Q2 25
$1.53
$1.76
Q1 25
$0.94
$2.04
Q4 24
$1.57
$3.22
Q3 24
$1.33
$2.16
Q2 24
$1.10
$2.66
Q1 24
$0.10
$2.60

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$366.0M
$318.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.7B
$10.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.2B
$9.2B
Total Assets
$9.8B
$20.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.13×
1.11×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
$366.0M
$318.1M
Q3 25
$399.2M
$296.5M
Q2 25
$342.3M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$296.2M
$287.2M
Q4 24
$308.6M
$447.4M
Q3 24
$310.2M
$599.0M
Q2 24
$247.4M
$542.3M
Q1 24
$191.9M
$271.6M
Total Debt
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
$3.7B
$10.3B
Q3 25
$10.0B
Q2 25
$10.4B
Q1 25
$9.4B
Q4 24
$3.8B
$9.4B
Q3 24
$9.5B
Q2 24
$9.4B
Q1 24
$9.1B
Stockholders' Equity
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
$3.2B
$9.2B
Q3 25
$3.2B
$9.3B
Q2 25
$3.4B
$9.4B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$9.6B
Q4 24
$2.8B
$9.7B
Q3 24
$3.0B
$9.6B
Q2 24
$2.7B
$9.7B
Q1 24
$2.7B
$9.9B
Total Assets
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
$9.8B
$20.2B
Q3 25
$9.8B
$20.1B
Q2 25
$9.7B
$20.5B
Q1 25
$9.3B
$19.6B
Q4 24
$9.1B
$19.8B
Q3 24
$9.5B
$19.8B
Q2 24
$9.3B
$19.8B
Q1 24
$9.2B
$19.6B
Debt / Equity
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
1.13×
1.11×
Q3 25
1.08×
Q2 25
1.11×
Q1 25
0.99×
Q4 24
1.33×
0.96×
Q3 24
0.99×
Q2 24
0.97×
Q1 24
0.91×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$88.8M
$733.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$66.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
6.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.66×
1.45×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$202.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
$88.8M
$733.6M
Q3 25
$118.0M
$875.1M
Q2 25
$145.9M
$872.7M
Q1 25
$-60.0M
$705.1M
Q4 24
$281.4M
$768.6M
Q3 24
$200.6M
$798.8M
Q2 24
$116.1M
$895.3M
Q1 24
$-95.1M
$665.6M
Free Cash Flow
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
$66.2M
Q3 25
$94.7M
Q2 25
$122.0M
Q1 25
$-80.1M
Q4 24
$260.9M
Q3 24
$174.5M
Q2 24
$88.0M
Q1 24
$-141.2M
FCF Margin
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
6.1%
Q3 25
8.6%
Q2 25
11.3%
Q1 25
-8.0%
Q4 24
23.6%
Q3 24
16.4%
Q2 24
8.5%
Q1 24
-14.9%
Capex Intensity
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
2.1%
Q3 25
2.1%
Q2 25
2.2%
Q1 25
2.0%
Q4 24
1.9%
Q3 24
2.5%
Q2 24
2.7%
Q1 24
4.8%
Cash Conversion
GTLS
GTLS
PSA
PSA
Q4 25
1.66×
1.45×
Q3 25
1.71×
Q2 25
1.92×
2.43×
Q1 25
-1.21×
1.73×
Q4 24
3.54×
1.25×
Q3 24
2.91×
1.86×
Q2 24
1.98×
1.73×
Q1 24
-8.42×
1.31×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GTLS
GTLS

Repair Service And Leasing Segment$330.4M31%
Heat Transfer Systems Segment$325.8M30%
Specialty Products Segment$259.5M24%
Transferred Over Time$94.4M9%
Transferred At Point In Time$69.5M6%

PSA
PSA

Self Storage Operations$1.1B93%
Ancillary Operations$86.9M7%

Related Comparisons