vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.5× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 13.7% vs 5.0%, a 8.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.8% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
GTLS vs SSNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $226.1M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $226.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $193.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $180.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $248.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $190.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | $420.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | $7.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $462.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $388.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $480.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $515.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $567.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $694.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $462.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $299.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $299.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $643.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $372.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $272.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $486.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $384.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $633.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $259.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $466.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $310.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $374.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |