vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GULF RESOURCES, INC. (GURE) and INTELLIGENT PROTECTION MANAGEMENT CORP. (IPM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GULF RESOURCES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.0M vs $6.1M, roughly 1.5× INTELLIGENT PROTECTION MANAGEMENT CORP.). On growth, INTELLIGENT PROTECTION MANAGEMENT CORP. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2091.6% vs 303.4%). Over the past eight quarters, INTELLIGENT PROTECTION MANAGEMENT CORP.'s revenue compounded faster (54.7% CAGR vs -37.1%).
EOG Resources, Inc. is an American energy company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in the Heritage Plaza building in Houston, Texas.
Intelligent Limited is a Holding Company and Parent company headquartered in Gloucestershire, United Kingdom and was incorporated on 21 May 2008. Intelligent Limited provides a group management structure for four companies and was born out of the operations of International Intelligence Limited, a company specialising in Intelligence, Counter Espionage and TSCM sweeping.
GURE vs IPM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $6.1M |
| Net Profit | $-35.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 53.1% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | -13.4% |
| Net Margin | -394.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 303.4% | 2091.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -921.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.9M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | $5.9M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | $8.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 23 | $9.3M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-35.7M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-773.8K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $808.5K | ||
| Q4 23 | $-58.8M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-1.8M | $-181.6K | ||
| Q2 23 | $-681.8K | $135.6K | ||
| Q1 23 | $-557.7K | $-738.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | 53.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 70.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | 8.5% | 73.8% | ||
| Q1 23 | 27.2% | 68.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.7% | -23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | -19.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -24.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | -114.7% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -39.1% | -14.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | -11.5% | -9.4% | ||
| Q1 23 | -8.6% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -394.3% | -17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.3% | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | -855.6% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -30.3% | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | -8.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 23 | -6.0% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.5M | $18.2M |
| Total Assets | $131.9M | $26.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | $72.2M | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $13.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.5M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.2M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | $205.2M | $20.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | $260.7M | $20.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $260.3M | $20.5M | ||
| Q1 23 | $274.8M | $20.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.9M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.6M | $29.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | $226.7M | $23.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | $278.9M | $24.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | $278.3M | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 23 | $295.7M | $24.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.7M | $87.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $87.6K | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $133.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-559.3K | $-888.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-42.6M | $-99.0K | ||
| Q3 23 | $-1.1M | $16.1K | ||
| Q2 23 | $6.2M | $-193.8K | ||
| Q1 23 | $4.8M | $-803.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-16.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $4.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -277.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 77.0% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | 51.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 258.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -1.43× | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GURE
| Bromine | $8.1M | 89% |
| Shandong Shouguang Shenrunfa Marine Chemical Company Limited | $1.4M | 15% |
IPM
| Procurement Revenue | $5.4M | 88% |
| Other | $743.9K | 12% |
