vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTELLIGENT PROTECTION MANAGEMENT CORP. (IPM) and Lucas GC Ltd (LGCL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lucas GC Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.5M vs $6.1M, roughly 1.2× INTELLIGENT PROTECTION MANAGEMENT CORP.).
Intelligent Limited is a Holding Company and Parent company headquartered in Gloucestershire, United Kingdom and was incorporated on 21 May 2008. Intelligent Limited provides a group management structure for four companies and was born out of the operations of International Intelligence Limited, a company specialising in Intelligence, Counter Espionage and TSCM sweeping.
IPM vs LGCL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1M | $7.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $414.1K |
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | -13.4% | 4.0% |
| Net Margin | — | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 2091.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $3.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $414.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $808.5K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-181.6K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $135.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.1% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 70.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 73.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -14.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -9.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 4.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.6M | $606.9K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.2M | $6.3M |
| Total Assets | $26.0M | $8.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3M | $606.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $978.1K | ||
| Q4 23 | $13.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $13.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $20.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | $23.9M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $24.4M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.6K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $87.6K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-888.7K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-99.0K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $16.1K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-193.8K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -1.43× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IPM
| Procurement Revenue | $5.4M | 88% |
| Other | $743.9K | 12% |
LGCL
| Recruitment service | $4.4M | 60% |
| Others | $2.9M | 39% |
