vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GULF RESOURCES, INC. (GURE) and SOLESENCE, INC. (SLSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOLESENCE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.5M vs $9.0M, roughly 1.4× GULF RESOURCES, INC.). SOLESENCE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 1.3% vs -394.3%, a 395.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GULF RESOURCES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (303.4% vs -0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, SOLESENCE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.5% CAGR vs -37.1%).
EOG Resources, Inc. is an American energy company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in the Heritage Plaza building in Houston, Texas.
GURE vs SLSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $12.5M |
| Net Profit | $-35.7M | $163.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | -394.3% | 1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 303.4% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -921.1% | 129.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $163.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-35.7M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-773.8K | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $80.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-559.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $856.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $893.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.7% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -394.3% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.3% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.5M | $17.6M |
| Total Assets | $131.9M | $50.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $429.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.5M | $17.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.2M | $18.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.9M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.6M | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.7M | $1.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 11.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-559.3K | $-654.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-565.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-404.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -39.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -90.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.66× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GURE
| Bromine | $8.1M | 89% |
| Shandong Shouguang Shenrunfa Marine Chemical Company Limited | $1.4M | 15% |
SLSN
Segment breakdown not available.