vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globavend Holdings Ltd (GVH) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Globavend Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.7M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.0× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Globavend Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs -13.2%, a 16.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globavend Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (63.7% vs 15.0%).
Globavend Holdings Ltd is a provider of smart unattended retail solutions, focusing on the design, supply, and operation of intelligent vending machines. It primarily serves markets across Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia, offering end-to-end services including hardware manufacturing, inventory management software, and after-sales support to clients in retail, FMCG, and workplace service segments.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
GVH vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.7M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $450.3K | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 3.3% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 63.7% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -49.9% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.01 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.7M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $450.3K | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $898.8K | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.57 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $915.2K | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.7M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $6.4M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $915.2K | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-906.3K | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.01× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-906.3K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-256.6K | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-730.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.29× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GVH
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
