vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HANMI FINANCIAL CORP (HAFC) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Urban Edge Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.6M vs $71.2M, roughly 1.9× HANMI FINANCIAL CORP). HANMI FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 17.1%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HANMI FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.1% vs 12.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Urban Edge Properties's revenue compounded faster (11.6% CAGR vs 10.4%).
Hanmi Bank Corporation is a community bank headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with 35 branches and eight loan production offices in California, Texas, Illinois, New York, New Jersey and Virginia.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
HAFC vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $71.2M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $21.2M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.1% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.0% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.70 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.2M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.2M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.8M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.8M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.5M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.7M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.2M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.1M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.9M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.73 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.49 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.48 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $796.4M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $796.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $779.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $762.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $751.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $732.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $736.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $707.1M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $3.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $206.0M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $203.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 286.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.70× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $356.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $206.0M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.9M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.0M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.6M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $203.7M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.4M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.6M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.9M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 286.2% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 206.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.0% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.1% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.70× | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.66× | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.26× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.97× | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.45× | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HAFC
Segment breakdown not available.
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
