vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Li Bang International Corp Inc. (LBGJ) and MIDDLEBY Corp (MIDD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MIDDLEBY Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($982.1M vs $4.7M, roughly 208.2× Li Bang International Corp Inc.). Li Bang International Corp Inc. runs the higher net margin — -23.9% vs -52.2%, a 28.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Li & Fung Limited is a Hong Kong–based supply chain management company. Established in 1906, the company became publicly traded in 1973 and has since played a significant role in manufacturing apparel, toys, and various consumer goods for major North American and European retailers. Significant growth occurred after its public listing, reaching a peak market capitalization in 2011, but the rise of platforms like Alibaba and Amazon, which directly connect manufacturers with consumers, created ...
The Middleby Corporation is a publicly traded American company based in Elgin, Illinois. The company manufactures commercial cooking equipment, industrial processing equipment, and residential appliances. The commercial cooking equipment side of Middleby does business with 97 out of the top 100 food service chains in the United States and internationally.
LBGJ vs MIDD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2024 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.7M | $982.1M |
| Net Profit | $-1.1M | $-513.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | -25.1% | -56.4% |
| Net Margin | -23.9% | -52.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -549.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-10.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $982.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $977.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $906.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $942.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $991.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $926.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.0B |
| Q3 25 | — | $-513.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $106.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $112.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $115.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $86.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $76.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 38.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | -56.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 11.4% |
| Q3 25 | — | -52.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.9% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 7.6% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-10.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.69 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | $2.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $175.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.8M | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $28.8M | $6.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.31× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $175.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $511.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $745.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $689.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $606.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $459.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $341.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $247.5M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.4B |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $3.2B |
| Q3 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.8M | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $6.9B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.75× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $258.4K | $176.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $156.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 15.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $591.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $141.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.4K | $239.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $156.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $149.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $140.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $255.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | $156.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $107.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $226.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $145.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $127.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $240.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 23.8% |
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.5% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 3.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LBGJ
Segment breakdown not available.
MIDD
| Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group | $433.7M | 44% |
| Other | $316.8M | 32% |
| Food Processing Group | $120.8M | 12% |
| Residential Kitchen | $110.8M | 11% |
