vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Huachen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co., Ltd (HCAI) and Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hillenbrand, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($550.2M vs $8.1M, roughly 67.5× Huachen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co., Ltd). Huachen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co., Ltd runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -0.4%, a 10.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Huachen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co., Ltd. is a smart parking solution provider that uses artificial intelligence and IoT technologies to deliver integrated parking management systems, intelligent parking lot operations, and value-added services for property operators, municipal authorities and commercial complexes mainly in China, helping optimize parking space utilization, cut operational costs and improve user parking experience.
Hillenbrand, Inc. is a global diversified industrial firm that designs, manufactures, and distributes specialized processing equipment and durable industrial solutions. It serves food & beverage, agriculture, manufacturing, waste management sectors, with operations across North America, Europe, and APAC.
HCAI vs HI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.1M | $550.2M |
| Net Profit | $815.9K | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 31.5% | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | -2.2% |
| Net Margin | 10.0% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -22.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -134.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $550.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $652.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $598.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $715.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $706.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $837.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $786.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $785.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $75.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $815.9K | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-40.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-248.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -32.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -31.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.5K | $173.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.5M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $57.6M | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $173.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $164.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.5K | $162.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $458.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $223.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $224.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.6M | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.5M | $-27.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-31.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -6.68× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-27.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $67.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.5M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $166.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $153.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.68× | -0.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCAI
Segment breakdown not available.
HI
| Transferred At Point In Time | $256.5M | 47% |
| Transferred Over Time | $207.1M | 38% |
| Molding Technology Solutions | $86.6M | 16% |