vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.6× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs 0.7%, a 24.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PARK NATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -16.5%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $3.4M).
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
HCM vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.8M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.5% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.6% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.8M | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.5M | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.7M | $157.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $152.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $455.0M | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.0% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 163.8% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $93.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.1M | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $802.5M | $261.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $306.1M |
| Q4 25 | $93.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.21× | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-96.2M | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.9M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.8M | $50.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.2M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-49.9M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $31.9M |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.6% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.16× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.38× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.54× | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
