vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC (TCBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($324.0M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.2× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 0.7%, a 22.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.5% vs -16.5%).
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.
HCM vs TCBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.8M | $324.0M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $73.8M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.5% | 15.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.6% | 56.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $1.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $324.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $270.8M | $327.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $340.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | $307.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.5M | $280.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $229.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.7M | $267.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $105.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $455.0M | $77.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $47.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $41.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -63.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.0% | 21.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 163.8% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $2.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $1.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $93.2M | $878.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $802.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $878.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.2M | $620.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $620.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4M | $620.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.8M | $660.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $660.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $660.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.1M | $660.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.9M | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.1M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $33.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $31.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $31.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $29.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.08× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.11× | 0.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.21× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-96.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $360.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.9M | $63.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | $368.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $480.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $332.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.8M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $347.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.2M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $415.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $317.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-49.9M | $11.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 106.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.6% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 180.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 253.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | 3.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.16× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.38× | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.76× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.54× | 0.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
