vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. (WOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($327.5M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.2× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 8.3% vs 0.7%, a 7.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs -16.5%). WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($39.1M vs $3.4M).

HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. is an American industrial manufacturing company headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. The company is composed of two business segments, consumer products and building products. Within these segments, the company designs and manufactures pressure vessels such as propane, oxygen and helium tanks, refrigerant and industrial cylinders, camping and residential use cylinders, water system tanks for storage, treatment, heating, expansion and flow control, as well as a variet...

HCM vs WOR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WOR
WOR
1.2× larger
WOR
$327.5M
$270.8M
HCM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WOR
WOR
+36.0% gap
WOR
19.5%
-16.5%
HCM
Higher net margin
WOR
WOR
7.6% more per $
WOR
8.3%
0.7%
HCM
More free cash flow
WOR
WOR
$35.7M more FCF
WOR
$39.1M
$3.4M
HCM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Revenue
$270.8M
$327.5M
Net Profit
$2.0M
$27.3M
Gross Margin
37.7%
25.8%
Operating Margin
-13.2%
3.7%
Net Margin
0.7%
8.3%
Revenue YoY
-16.5%
19.5%
Net Profit YoY
-83.6%
-3.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.00
$0.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$270.8M
$327.5M
Q3 25
$303.7M
Q2 25
$277.7M
Q1 25
$324.5M
Q2 24
$305.7M
Q2 23
$532.9M
Q2 22
$202.0M
Net Profit
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$2.0M
$27.3M
Q3 25
$35.1M
Q2 25
$455.0M
Q1 25
$11.9M
Q2 24
$25.8M
Q2 23
$168.6M
Q2 22
$-162.9M
Gross Margin
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
37.7%
25.8%
Q3 25
27.1%
Q2 25
0.1%
Q1 25
48.0%
Q2 24
41.1%
Q2 23
0.0%
Q2 22
0.1%
Operating Margin
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
-13.2%
3.7%
Q3 25
3.0%
Q2 25
-1.3%
Q1 25
-5.0%
Q2 24
-9.0%
Q2 23
21.0%
Q2 22
-97.4%
Net Margin
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
0.7%
8.3%
Q3 25
11.6%
Q2 25
163.8%
Q1 25
3.7%
Q2 24
8.4%
Q2 23
31.6%
Q2 22
-80.6%
EPS (diluted)
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$0.00
$0.55
Q3 25
$0.70
Q2 25
$0.52
Q1 25
$0.01
Q2 24
$0.03
Q2 23
$0.19
Q2 22
$-0.19

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.4B
$180.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$93.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.2B
$962.6M
Total Assets
$1.8B
$1.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.08×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$1.4B
$180.3M
Q3 25
$167.1M
Q2 25
$1.4B
Q1 25
$836.1M
Q2 24
$802.5M
Q2 23
$856.2M
Q2 22
$826.2M
Total Debt
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$93.2M
Q3 25
Q2 25
$93.4M
Q1 25
$82.8M
Q2 24
$82.1M
Q2 23
$40.1M
Q2 22
$418.0K
Stockholders' Equity
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$1.2B
$962.6M
Q3 25
$959.1M
Q2 25
$1.2B
Q1 25
$759.9M
Q2 24
$740.1M
Q2 23
$782.0M
Q2 22
$799.7M
Total Assets
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$1.8B
$1.8B
Q3 25
$1.7B
Q2 25
$1.8B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.3B
Q2 23
$1.3B
Q2 22
$1.2B
Debt / Equity
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
0.08×
Q3 25
Q2 25
0.08×
Q1 25
0.11×
Q2 24
0.11×
Q2 23
0.05×
Q2 22
0.00×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$8.2M
$51.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$3.4M
$39.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.2%
11.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.8%
3.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.21×
1.89×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-96.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$8.2M
$51.5M
Q3 25
$41.1M
Q2 25
$-72.9M
Q1 25
$40.3M
Q2 24
$-39.8M
Q2 23
$226.4M
Q2 22
$-89.9M
Free Cash Flow
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$3.4M
$39.1M
Q3 25
$27.9M
Q2 25
$-82.2M
Q1 25
$32.5M
Q2 24
$-49.9M
Q2 23
$202.0M
Q2 22
$-105.6M
FCF Margin
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
1.2%
11.9%
Q3 25
9.2%
Q2 25
-29.6%
Q1 25
10.0%
Q2 24
-16.3%
Q2 23
37.9%
Q2 22
-52.3%
Capex Intensity
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
1.8%
3.8%
Q3 25
4.3%
Q2 25
3.3%
Q1 25
2.4%
Q2 24
3.3%
Q2 23
4.6%
Q2 22
7.8%
Cash Conversion
HCM
HCM
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
4.21×
1.89×
Q3 25
1.17×
Q2 25
-0.16×
Q1 25
3.38×
Q2 24
-1.54×
Q2 23
1.34×
Q2 22

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HCM
HCM

Segment breakdown not available.

WOR
WOR

Building Products$207.5M63%
Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Other$120.7M37%

Related Comparisons