vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH) and JBT Marel Corp (JBTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JBT Marel Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $624.4M, roughly 1.6× Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.). JBT Marel Corp runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 1.0%, a 4.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBT Marel Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (115.6% vs -33.2%). Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($348.6M vs $83.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (91.0% CAGR vs 60.3%).
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
JBT Marel Corporation, formerly known as JBT Corporation, or John Bean Technologies Corporation, is a food processing machinery and automated vehicle company. The company was incorporated in 2008 when FMC Technologies divested its non-energy businesses. The company is based in Chicago, Illinois and traces its history back to a company founded in 1884 by John Bean, an orchardist in Los Gatos, California.
HHH vs JBTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $624.4M | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $6.0M | $53.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 7.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.0% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -33.2% | 115.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.2% | 858.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.20 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $624.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $390.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.9M | $934.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.3M | $854.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $935.0M | $467.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.1M | $453.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.4M | $402.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.1M | $392.3M |
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.5M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $-173.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.8M | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.1M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.5M | $22.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.6% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.8% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | -20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.7% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.7% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $-3.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.14 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.46 | $1.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.06 | $0.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5B | $167.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $10.6B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.35× | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $167.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $648.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $647.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $647.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.35× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.43× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $360.3M | $117.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $348.6M | $83.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 55.8% | 8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 60.04× | 2.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $417.6M | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $360.3M | $117.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $149.8M | $87.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.3M | $102.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-224.9M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.1M | $128.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $248.3M | $71.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-171.2M | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.7M | $56.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.7M | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-238.4M | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.1M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.7M | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-182.0M | $-100.0K |
| Q4 25 | 55.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -119.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.9% | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -106.4% | -0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 60.04× | 2.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.25× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.41× | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.83× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HHH
| Transferred At Point In Time | $499.8M | 80% |
| Operating Assets Segment | $117.9M | 19% |
| Builder Price Participation | $12.9M | 2% |
JBTM
Segment breakdown not available.
