vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH) and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($624.4M vs $327.6M, roughly 1.9× Navios Maritime Partners L.P.). Navios Maritime Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 21.4% vs 1.0%, a 20.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Navios Maritime Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.3% vs -33.2%).
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
HHH vs NMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $624.4M | $327.6M |
| Net Profit | $6.0M | $69.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.0% | 21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -33.2% | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.2% | -31.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.20 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $624.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $390.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.9M | $327.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $935.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.4M | $342.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.1M | $69.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.1M | $101.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 90.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 88.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.46 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.06 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5B | $377.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | — |
| Total Assets | $10.6B | $5.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.35× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $377.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.8M | $272.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $360.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $348.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 55.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 60.04× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $417.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $360.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $149.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-224.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $248.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-171.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-238.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-182.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -119.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -106.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 60.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.83× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HHH
| Transferred At Point In Time | $499.8M | 80% |
| Operating Assets Segment | $117.9M | 19% |
| Builder Price Participation | $12.9M | 2% |
NMM
Segment breakdown not available.
