vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Huntington Ingalls Industries is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.5× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 8.9%, a 5.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Huntington Ingalls Industries posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 1.7%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $-461.0M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -25.2%).
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) is the largest military shipbuilding company in the United States as well as a provider of professional services to partners in government and industry. HII was formed on 31 March 2011, as a divestiture from Northrop Grumman.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
HII vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $149.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 8.9% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.79 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $149.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $159.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.0M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $149.0M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.0M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | $118.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 21.4% |
| Q1 26 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | $3.79 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.06 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.68 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.86 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.79 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.15 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.56 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.38 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $216.0M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.1B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $12.5B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.52× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $216.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.4M |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $12.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.3B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.1B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.1B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.53× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.58× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-390.0M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-461.0M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -27.7% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.62× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $795.0M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-390.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $650.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.0M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-395.0M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.0M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $213.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.0M | $196.9M |
| Q1 26 | $-461.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $516.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $727.0M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-462.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $277.0M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $125.0M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-99.0M | $100.8M |
| Q1 26 | -27.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.3% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | -2.62× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.09× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.41× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.65× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.18× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.11× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.05× | 1.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HII
Segment breakdown not available.
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |