vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STRATASYS LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.0M vs $120.4M, roughly 1.1× Hippo Holdings Inc.). Hippo Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -40.6%, a 45.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hippo Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs -2.2%). Hippo Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.1M vs $2.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Hippo Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
HIPO vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.4M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $6.0M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.4% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $120.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.6M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.3M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.3M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.5M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.6M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.1M | $144.1M |
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.7M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.5M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.5M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-35.7M | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.3% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41.3% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.4% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -40.7% | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -38.7% | -17.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.3% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.2% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.2% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -42.0% | -18.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.77 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.91 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.81 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.64 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.47 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $218.3M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $436.1M | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.7M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.9M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.9M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.9M | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $223.4M | $91.1M |
| Q4 25 | $436.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $421.5M | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.5M | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $322.8M | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.4M | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $322.6M | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $351.2M | $866.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.2M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.1M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.8M | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.6M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.8M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.7M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.6M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.7M | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.7M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.9% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.7% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
