vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Urban Edge Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.6M vs $120.4M, roughly 1.1× Hippo Holdings Inc.). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs 5.0%, a 12.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hippo Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 12.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Hippo Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs 11.6%).
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
HIPO vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.4M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $6.0M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.4% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.4M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.6M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.3M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.3M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.9M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.5M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.6M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.2M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.5M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.5M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -40.7% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.3% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.4% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.2% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.77 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.91 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.81 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.34 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.64 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $218.3M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $436.1M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.3M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.7M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.9M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.9M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.6M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.9M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $436.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $421.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $322.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $322.6M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $3.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.2M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.53× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.6M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.5M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.8M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.6M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.6M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.7M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.2M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.7M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.9% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.00× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HIPO
Segment breakdown not available.
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
