vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.1M vs $51.2M, roughly 1.8× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -98.1% vs -106.3%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (218.6% vs -1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (102.2% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Mastech Digital, Inc. is a digital transformation and information technology (IT) services company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, providing services to corporations across North America, Middle East, Asian, and Japan.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
HIVE vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.1M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $-91.3M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | -27.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | -98.1% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 218.6% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -234.0% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.3M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.6M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.6M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-91.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.8M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.2M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.0K | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | -27.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -43.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -98.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.8% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 233.2% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.52 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $559.3M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $624.0M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $559.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $624.6M | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $560.5M | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $430.9M | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.5M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.6M | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $484.6M |
| Q4 25 | $624.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $693.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $478.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $334.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.0M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $46.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.6M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.5M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -189.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -153.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 92.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 143.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.42× | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
