vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HiTek Global Inc. (HKIT) and ScanTech AI Systems Inc. (STAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HiTek Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($741.5K vs $631.0K, roughly 1.2× ScanTech AI Systems Inc.). HiTek Global Inc. runs the higher net margin — -123.5% vs -1532.9%, a 1409.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
DB HiTek Co., Ltd., formerly Dongbu HiTek, is a semiconductor contract manufacturing and design company headquartered in Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. DB HiTek is one of the major contract chip manufacturers, alongside TSMC, Samsung Electronics, GlobalFoundries, and UMC. It is also the second-largest foundry company in South Korea, behind Samsung Electronics.
HKIT vs STAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $741.5K | $631.0K |
| Net Profit | $-916.1K | $-9.7M |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | -181.7% | -773.2% |
| Net Margin | -123.5% | -1532.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -59.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -853.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $631.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $741.5K | $884.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $346.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-916.1K | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-17.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $121.7K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $622.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 50.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -773.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -181.7% | -440.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4503.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 17.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -1532.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -123.5% | -785.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5174.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 21.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $29.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $17.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $34.6M | — |
| Total Assets | $41.1M | $5.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $12.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $26.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.1M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $33.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.2M | $-758.5K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-758.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $754.1K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $200.9K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $744.3K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $60.3K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -166.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -623.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 2.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 4.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
