vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Classover Holdings, Inc. (KIDZ) and ScanTech AI Systems Inc. (STAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ScanTech AI Systems Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($631.0K vs $537.1K, roughly 1.2× Classover Holdings, Inc.). Classover Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1005.8% vs -1532.9%, a 527.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Classover Holdings, Inc. is an education technology company that provides live interactive online learning courses targeted primarily at children aged 3 to 12. Its core service portfolio includes STEM, language learning, arts, and social skill development programs, with main markets covering the United States and global Chinese-speaking family segments.
KIDZ vs STAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $537.1K | $631.0K |
| Net Profit | $-5.4M | $-9.7M |
| Gross Margin | 54.1% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | -184.7% | -773.2% |
| Net Margin | -1005.8% | -1532.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $537.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $631.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.6K | $884.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $816.0K | $346.1K |
| Q4 25 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-297.2K | $-17.9M |
| Q4 25 | 54.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.8% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.7% | 29.4% |
| Q4 25 | -184.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -47.0% | -773.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -234.1% | -440.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.3% | -4503.9% |
| Q4 25 | -1005.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 195.8% | -1532.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -532.8% | -785.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.4% | -5174.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $17.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8M | — |
| Total Assets | $15.5M | $5.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.1M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $5.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-652.2K | $-758.5K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-652.2K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.5M | $-758.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-336.5K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-288.3K | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -166.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -623.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
