vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of H2O AMERICA (HTO) and Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Utz Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($341.0M vs $199.4M, roughly 1.7× H2O AMERICA). H2O AMERICA runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 0.7%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, H2O AMERICA posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.5% vs -3.1%). Over the past eight quarters, H2O AMERICA's revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs -1.5%).
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
Utz Brands, Inc., more commonly known as Utz, is an American snack food company based in Hanover, Pennsylvania. The company produces a variety of potato chips, pretzels, and other snacks, with most products sold under their family of brands. Utz is also a snack supplier to warehouse clubs and merchandisers.
HTO vs UTZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.4M | $341.0M |
| Net Profit | $16.2M | $2.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.5% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.5% | -3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.2% | 108.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.45 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $199.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $243.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.5M | $341.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.7M | $365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $356.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.0M | $346.5M |
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.7M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.5% |
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.17 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.64 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.7M | $56.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $768.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $696.9M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | 1.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $64.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $66.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $768.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $780.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $797.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $756.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $696.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $685.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $686.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $671.1M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.13× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.5M | $54.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $16.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.92× | 23.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.5M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.5M | $52.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.3M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.2M | $-9.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.92× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | 23.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.38× | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.38× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
UTZ
Segment breakdown not available.
