vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC (HTZ) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.0× HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs -9.6%, a 25.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., known as Hertz, is an American car rental company based in Estero, Florida. The company operates its namesake Hertz brand, along with the brands Dollar Rent A Car, Firefly Car Rental, and Thrifty Car Rental.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
HTZ vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $-194.0M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | -11.0% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | -9.6% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.6% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.5% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.46 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-194.0M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.0M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-294.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-443.0M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-479.0M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3B | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-865.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -11.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.5% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.0% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -62.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.1% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -9.6% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.8% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.46 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.95 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.44 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.57 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.34 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.82 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $565.0M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-459.0M | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $22.3B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $565.0M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $503.0M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.0M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.0M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $568.0M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-459.0M | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-317.0M | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-504.0M | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-262.0M | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.0M | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $681.0M | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.3B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.0B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.0B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.0B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $193.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.0M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $835.0M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.0M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $414.0M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $894.0M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $546.0M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.54× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
