vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Public Storage (PSA) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.7× Public Storage). Public Storage runs the higher net margin — 41.7% vs 15.8%, a 25.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 2.5%).
Public Storage, headquartered in Glendale, California, is a real estate investment trust that invests in self storage. It is the largest brand of self-storage services in the US and owns approximately 9% of the self storage square footage in the U.S. As of December 31, 2024, the company operated 3,073 self-storage facilities containing an aggregate of 221 million net rentable square feet of space.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
PSA vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $507.1M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 40.7% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 41.7% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -17.5% | 842.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.59 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $507.1M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $511.1M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $407.8M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $614.6M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $430.3M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $518.1M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.7% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.4% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.8% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.7% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.6% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.2% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.59 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.62 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.76 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.04 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.22 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.16 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.66 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $318.1M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.3B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.2B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $20.2B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.11× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $318.1M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $296.5M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $287.2M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $447.4M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $599.0M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $542.3M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.3B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.4B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.2B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.5B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.6B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.8B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.11× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.96× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.97× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $733.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.45× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $733.6M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $875.1M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $872.7M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $705.1M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $768.6M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $798.8M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.3M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.43× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.73× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.25× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.86× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PSA
| Self Storage Operations | $1.1B | 93% |
| Ancillary Operations | $86.9M | 7% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
