vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC (HTZ) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.2× Take-Two Interactive). Take-Two Interactive runs the higher net margin — -5.5% vs -9.6%, a 4.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Take-Two Interactive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs -0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Take-Two Interactive's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., known as Hertz, is an American car rental company based in Estero, Florida. The company operates its namesake Hertz brand, along with the brands Dollar Rent A Car, Firefly Car Rental, and Thrifty Car Rental.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
HTZ vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $-194.0M | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | -11.0% | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | -9.6% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.6% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.5% | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.46 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $-194.0M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.0M | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-294.0M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-443.0M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-479.0M | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3B | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-865.0M | $-262.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-186.0M | $-2.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.5% |
| Q4 25 | -11.0% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.0% | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -62.9% | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.1% | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.9% | -193.9% |
| Q4 25 | -9.6% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.4% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.7% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.8% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.9% | -207.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.46 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.95 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.44 | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.57 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.34 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.82 | $-1.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.61 | $-17.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $565.0M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-459.0M | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $22.3B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $565.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $503.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.0M | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $568.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $465.0M | $776.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-459.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-317.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-504.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-262.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.0M | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $681.0M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | $22.3B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.0B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.0B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.0B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2B | $12.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.3B | $12.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $193.0M | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $193.0M | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $835.0M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.0M | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.0M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $414.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $894.0M | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $546.0M | $-191.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $370.0M | $-8.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-226.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
