vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and PAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP (PAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.9× Hubbell Incorporated).
Hubbell Incorporated, headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut, is an American company that designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and electronic products for non-residential and residential construction, industrial, and utility applications. Hubbell was founded by Harvey Hubbell as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905.
Pan American Silver Corporation is a mining company based in Canada with operations in Latin America. The company has mines and other projects in Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina.
HUBB vs PAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2022
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $217.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | 34.6% | 27.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 14.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.06 | $-1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $217.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $244.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.77 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.56 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.15 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.65 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.94 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.73 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $497.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | — |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $497.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $680.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $345.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $406.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $400.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.65× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $447.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $388.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.06× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $874.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $284.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $432.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $239.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $388.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $364.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HUBB
| Grid Infrastructure | $717.0M | 48% |
| Industrial | $393.7M | 26% |
| Grid Automation | $218.9M | 15% |
| Electrical Products | $163.1M | 11% |
PAAS
Segment breakdown not available.
