vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $21.3M, roughly 1.9× i-80 Gold Corp.). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -401.9%, a 382.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.8M vs $-39.2M).
i-80 Gold Corp is a mineral exploration and development firm focused on gold and silver asset operations in Nevada, US. It advances high-potential mining projects, using responsible extraction practices to deliver precious metals to global industrial and investment markets.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
IAUX vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.3M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $-85.6M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | -291.6% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | -401.9% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-85.6M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-41.9M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.2M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-41.2M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.1M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.0M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -42.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -171.4% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | -291.6% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -86.7% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -67.4% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -112.3% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -210.0% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -435.2% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | -401.9% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -130.8% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -108.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -293.3% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -374.5% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -570.8% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.2M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $174.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $346.8M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $703.4M | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.50× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.2M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.9M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.7M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.5M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.8M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.8M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $174.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $175.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $423.0M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $463.5M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.9M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.2M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $703.4M | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $756.2M | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $782.9M | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $659.0M | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $426.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-34.3M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-39.2M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -184.3% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 23.1% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-93.2M | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-34.3M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.2M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.3M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.5M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-39.2M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.5M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.4M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.1M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.8M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | -184.3% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -44.7% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -164.1% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -206.7% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -349.1% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IAUX
| Granite Creek Mining Company | $20.3M | 95% |
| Ruby Hill Mining Company LLC | $991.0K | 5% |
| Lone Tree Minning Company | $3.0K | 0% |
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
