vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX) and NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (NEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.6M vs $21.3M, roughly 1.1× i-80 Gold Corp.). i-80 Gold Corp. runs the higher net margin — -401.9% vs -677.3%, a 275.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
i-80 Gold Corp is a mineral exploration and development firm focused on gold and silver asset operations in Nevada, US. It advances high-potential mining projects, using responsible extraction practices to deliver precious metals to global industrial and investment markets.
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership is a real estate investment entity that owns, operates and manages residential and commercial properties primarily across the U.S. New England region. Its core assets include multifamily apartments, mixed-use properties and small commercial spaces, serving tenants across Massachusetts, New Hampshire and adjacent states, delivering steady returns to unitholders via rental income and property value growth.
IAUX vs NEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.3M | $23.6M |
| Net Profit | $-85.6M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -291.6% | 14.0% |
| Net Margin | -401.9% | -677.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -133.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $19.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-85.6M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-41.9M | $-521.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.2M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-41.2M | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.1M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.0M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -42.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -171.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -291.6% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -86.7% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -67.4% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -112.3% | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -210.0% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -435.2% | 32.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | -401.9% | -677.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -130.8% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -108.5% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -293.3% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -374.5% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -570.8% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.2M | $26.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $174.7M | $531.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $346.8M | — |
| Total Assets | $703.4M | $505.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.50× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.2M | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.9M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.7M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.5M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.8M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.8M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $28.8M |
| Q4 25 | $174.7M | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.9M | $514.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $175.8M | $514.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.5M | $407.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $408.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $409.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $410.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $410.7M |
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $423.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $463.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $703.4M | $505.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $756.2M | $492.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $782.9M | $494.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $659.0M | $385.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $393.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $387.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $383.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $381.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-34.3M | $27.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-39.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -184.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 23.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-93.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-34.3M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.3M | $12.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.5M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.6M | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-39.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -184.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -44.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -164.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -206.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -349.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IAUX
| Granite Creek Mining Company | $20.3M | 95% |
| Ruby Hill Mining Company LLC | $991.0K | 5% |
| Lone Tree Minning Company | $3.0K | 0% |
NEN
Segment breakdown not available.