vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IDACORP INC (IDA) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IDACORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($360.1M vs $184.5M, roughly 2.0× DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC). IDACORP INC runs the higher net margin — 12.1% vs 7.0%, a 5.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs -4.2%). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.8M vs $-216.2M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs -7.2%).
IDACORP, Inc is an electricity holding company, incorporated in Idaho with headquarters in Boise. It comprises Idaho Power Company, IDACORP Financial and Ida-West Energy. It was formed on October 1, 1998.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
IDA vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $360.1M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $43.6M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | 12.1% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.2% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $360.1M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $526.4M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $449.3M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $411.1M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $375.9M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.5M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $442.6M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $417.9M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.4M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.8M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.6M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.5M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.2M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 14.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.3% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.5% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.78 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.26 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.76 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.10 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.72 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.95 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $215.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $10.2B | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.93× | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $215.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $333.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $474.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $634.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $368.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1B | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9B | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7B | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.3B | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.93× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.92× | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.8M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-216.2M | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -60.0% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 98.3% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.16× | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-577.5M | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.8M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.8M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $176.9M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.4M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.9M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $109.7M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-216.2M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-127.9M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-156.4M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-77.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-48.9M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.1M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-199.6M | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-150.3M | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | -60.0% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.3% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.8% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.0% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.0% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | 98.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 78.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.2% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.16× | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.08× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.60× | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.78× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.28× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IDA
| Retailrevenues | $323.0M | 90% |
| Transmissionserviceswheeling | $18.6M | 5% |
| Energyefficiencyprogramrevenues | $11.7M | 3% |
| Wholesaleenergysales | $10.5M | 3% |
| Otherrevenues | $9.5M | 3% |
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
