vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.6M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.1× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -13.2%, a 77.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs 16.1%).
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
IDR vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $9.4M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 62.4% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 64.3% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 92.0% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 220.6% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 68.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.6% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.8% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.8% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.3% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.7% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.3% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 64.3% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.2% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.2% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.8% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.2M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $116.2M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $108.2M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.3M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.6M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $116.2M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.1M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.7M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.7M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 56.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $709.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IDR
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
