vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR) and WEST BANCORPORATION INC (WTBA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WEST BANCORPORATION INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.8× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs 39.2%, a 25.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs 16.6%). WEST BANCORPORATION INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($12.4M vs $8.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs 17.3%).
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
West Bancorporation Inc. is a regional financial holding company headquartered in the U.S. Midwest, primarily serving markets across Iowa and Minnesota. It provides a full suite of personal and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, mortgage loans, business lending, and wealth management solutions for individual consumers, small-to-medium enterprises, and local organizational clients.
IDR vs WTBA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $9.4M | $10.6M |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 62.4% | 50.0% |
| Net Margin | 64.3% | 39.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 92.0% | 16.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 220.6% | 34.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $24.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $23.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $19.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $5.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 68.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | 39.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | 43.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | 43.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | 32.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 64.3% | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.2% | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | 34.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.2% | 26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $362.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.2M | $270.7M |
| Total Assets | $116.2M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $362.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $471.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $232.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $345.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $243.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $270.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.2M | $266.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $255.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.3M | $240.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | $237.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.7M | $227.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | $223.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.2M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.1M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.7M | $12.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.2M | $12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 56.0% | 46.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.7% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | 1.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.4M | $79.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $9.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $709.8K | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 46.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | 178.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | 53.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 35.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 65.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 125.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 37.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | 6.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | 1.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 1.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.50× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | 5.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
