vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. (IGIC) and MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($403.8M vs $284.8M, roughly 1.4× MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP). International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 26.0% vs 15.3%, a 10.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
China Taiping Insurance Holdings Company Limited (CTIH) formerly China Insurance International Holdings Company Limited (CIIH), is a Chinese insurance conglomerate. The company has strong Chinese Central Government background despite being incorporated in Hong Kong. It is considered as a red chip company.
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
IGIC vs MATW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $403.8M | $284.8M |
| Net Profit | $105.1M | $43.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 34.2% |
| Net Margin | 26.0% | 15.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -29.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 1356.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.31 | $1.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $284.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $369.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.8M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $293.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-134.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.7M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-103.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -73.3% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -36.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -35.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.31 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.36 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.55 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $244.7M | $31.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $529.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $654.8M | $543.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $244.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $237.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $122.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $529.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $543.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $654.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $662.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $588.2M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $411.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $1.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $120.7M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.8M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.1% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
