vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IHS Holding Ltd (IHS) and Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Utz Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($341.0M vs $254.0M, roughly 1.3× IHS Holding Ltd). On growth, IHS Holding Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.1% vs -3.1%). IHS Holding Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($178.6M vs $16.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Utz Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.5% CAGR vs -22.0%).
IHS Towers is one of the largest independent owners, operators and developers of shared communications infrastructure in the world, with operations across Africa and Latin America. It is the fifth-largest independent multinational tower company in the world.
Utz Brands, Inc., more commonly known as Utz, is an American snack food company based in Hanover, Pennsylvania. The company produces a variety of potato chips, pretzels, and other snacks, with most products sold under their family of brands. Utz is also a snack supplier to warehouse clubs and merchandisers.
IHS vs UTZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $254.0M | $341.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $2.3M |
| Gross Margin | 83.6% | 25.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | — | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.1% | -3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 108.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $254.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $455.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $433.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $439.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $253.8M | $341.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $420.3M | $365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $435.4M | $356.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $417.7M | $346.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-205.7M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-124.3M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6B | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 72.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.5% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.1% | 25.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.0% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.7% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -48.9% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -372.8% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.61 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.36 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.67 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $825.7M | $56.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.1B | $768.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-89.8M | $696.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $825.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $647.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $531.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $629.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $578.0M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $397.5M | $64.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $445.7M | $66.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.2M | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $768.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $780.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $797.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $756.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-89.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-98.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-184.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-314.4M | $696.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-284.7M | $685.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-308.3M | $686.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-163.2M | $671.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 85.85× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.13× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $246.9M | $54.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $178.6M | $16.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 70.3% | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 26.9% | 11.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $718.7M | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $246.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $344.4M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $52.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.7M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.8M | $-9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $178.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $189.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $282.9M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.3M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.2M | $-15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.8M | $-22.7M |
| Q4 25 | 70.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 111.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | -6.5% |
| Q4 25 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.52× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
