vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO (SHEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($91.6M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.5× Information Services Group Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -5.9%, a 10.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.2% vs 5.9%). Information Services Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.3M vs $-78.6M). Over the past eight quarters, SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO's revenue compounded faster (15.0% CAGR vs -2.4%).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co is a U.S. regional telecom provider offering broadband internet, wireless voice/data services, digital cable TV, and fiber-optic solutions. It serves residential, small business and enterprise clients across Mid-Atlantic states, focusing on underserved rural and suburban markets in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania.
III vs SHEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $91.6M |
| Net Profit | $2.6M | $-5.4M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 7.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.1% | -95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $89.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $88.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $87.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $85.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $87.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $85.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.3M | $69.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $214.7M |
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.7% | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 310.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $4.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | $27.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $642.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.7M | $880.8M |
| Total Assets | $211.0M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $389.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $642.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $535.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $418.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $345.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $298.7M |
| Q4 25 | $94.7M | $880.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $892.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $902.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.0M | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.3M | $918.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $925.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.5M | $933.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.6M | $871.6M |
| Q4 25 | $211.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $234.2M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.1M | $28.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.3M | $-78.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | -85.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 117.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.94× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.0M | $-257.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $978.0K | $20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | $-78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $-51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $-65.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | $-62.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $-72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-51.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-78.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $-54.9M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | -85.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | -57.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | -71.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | -84.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -58.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -91.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | -79.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 91.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 97.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 94.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 108.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 86.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 94.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 101.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
III
Segment breakdown not available.
SHEN
| Residential And SMB Incumbent Broadband | $41.5M | 45% |
| Residential And SMB Glo Fiber Expansion Markets | $23.0M | 25% |
| Commercial Fiber | $20.3M | 22% |
| RLEC Other | $6.8M | 7% |