vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and LXP Industrial Trust (LXP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $86.7M, roughly 1.4× LXP Industrial Trust). LXP Industrial Trust runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs 0.5%, a 32.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs -14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 0.3%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
IMAX vs LXP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $86.7M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | 81.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 34.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 33.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | -14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $86.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $87.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $100.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $85.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $85.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $86.3M |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $36.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $-269.0K |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | 81.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | 81.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | 80.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | 82.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | 82.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | 82.4% |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | -0.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $170.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $3.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.66× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $170.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $229.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $71.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $70.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $101.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $293.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $188.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | 6.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $188.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $63.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $44.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $39.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $211.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $64.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $38.9M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | 6.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 1.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | 2.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 10.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | 7.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
LXP
Segment breakdown not available.
