vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and National Bank Holdings Corp (NBHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
National Bank Holdings Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($126.8M vs $125.2M, roughly 1.0× IMAX CORP). National Bank Holdings Corp runs the higher net margin — 16.4% vs 0.5%, a 15.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 14.0%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Old National Bank is an American regional bank with nearly 200 retail branches operated by Old National Bancorp and based in Chicago and Evansville, Indiana. With assets at $48.5 billion and 250 banking centers, Old National Bancorp is the largest financial services bank holding company headquartered in Indiana and one of the top 30 banking companies in the U.S. Old National Bank has locations in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.
IMAX vs NBHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $126.8M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $20.8M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | -14.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $100.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $108.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $104.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $102.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $101.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $106.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $97.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $24.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $26.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 39.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 39.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 34.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 32.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 32.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 23.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 26.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $0.68 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $472.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $202.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $12.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.12× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $472.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $417.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $555.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $296.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $246.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $127.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $180.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $145.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $202.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $54.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $54.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $54.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $54.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $9.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $10.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $10.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $10.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $162.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $39.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $155.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $31.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | 10.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | 1.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | 5.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | 1.22× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
NBHC
| Net Interest Income | $108.8M | 86% |
| Noninterest Income | $18.0M | 14% |
