vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.3M vs $125.2M, roughly 1.1× IMAX CORP). IMAX CORP runs the higher net margin — 0.5% vs -31.4%, a 31.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 0.0%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
IMAX vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 110.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 110.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
PDM
Segment breakdown not available.
