vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP (PGC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $78.2M, roughly 1.6× PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP). PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 0.5%, a 15.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 26.5%). PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.8M vs $28.0M). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 21.4%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Peapack Gladstone Financial Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company that provides commercial and consumer banking, wealth management, private banking, lending solutions, and trust services, primarily serving individual and small-to-medium business clients across New Jersey and the surrounding U.S. Northeast region.
IMAX vs PGC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $12.2M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 21.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | 26.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | 31.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $53.1M |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.43 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $658.2M |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $7.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $658.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $642.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $629.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $621.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $605.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $607.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $588.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $582.4M |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $43.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | $28.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | 36.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 18.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | 3.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $852.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $19.1M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $-431.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | $18.0M |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | -17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 101.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | 33.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | 3.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 3.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | -1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | 7.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 3.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | 2.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
PGC
| Banking Segment | $61.4M | 79% |
| Wealth Management Division | $13.9M | 18% |
| Other | $2.9M | 4% |
