vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Perella Weinberg Partners is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.2M vs $125.2M, roughly 1.8× IMAX CORP). Perella Weinberg Partners runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 0.5%, a 5.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs -2.9%). Perella Weinberg Partners produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.5M vs $28.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Perella Weinberg Partners's revenue compounded faster (46.5% CAGR vs 25.8%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
PJT Partners, Inc. is a global advisory-focused investment bank, founded in October 2015 as part of The Blackstone Group's spin-off of its financial and strategic advisory services businesses.
IMAX vs PWP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $219.2M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $13.8M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $219.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $155.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $211.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $225.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $278.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $272.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $102.1M |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $-66.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $-35.8M |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -30.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | -52.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -24.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $-0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $255.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $-127.4M |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $797.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $255.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $145.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $111.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $407.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $335.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $185.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $156.7M |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $-127.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $-302.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $-318.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $-323.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $-421.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $-360.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $-283.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $161.9M |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $797.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $650.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $606.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $570.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $876.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $810.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $645.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $583.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $34.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | $30.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | 2.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | $-34.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $-176.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $223.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $90.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $-206.3M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $55.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-177.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $207.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | $-214.8M |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | -83.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 91.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 71.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | 30.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | -210.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 9.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 20.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | -10.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 12.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
PWP
Segment breakdown not available.
