vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and TRICO BANCSHARES (TCBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $109.4M, roughly 1.1× TRICO BANCSHARES ). TRICO BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 251.6% vs 0.5%, a 251.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 9.0%). TRICO BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($127.9M vs $28.0M). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 5.4%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Trico Bancshares is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company operating Tri Counties Bank. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services including deposit products, mortgages, small business loans, and wealth management, primarily serving consumers and SMEs in Northern California.
IMAX vs TCBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $109.4M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $33.6M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 42.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 251.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | 15.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $107.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $103.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $98.5M |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $26.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 40.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 251.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 221.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $0.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $157.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $298.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $314.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $145.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $320.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $206.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $82.8M |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $9.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $133.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | $127.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | 116.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | $222.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $133.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $109.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $31.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $127.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | $24.1M |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | 24.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | 3.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
TCBK
Segment breakdown not available.
