vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and WORKIVA INC (WK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WORKIVA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($238.9M vs $125.2M, roughly 1.9× IMAX CORP). WORKIVA INC runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs 0.5%, a 4.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 19.5%). WORKIVA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.7M vs $28.0M). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 16.6%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Workiva, Inc. is a global software-as-a-service (SaaS) company. It provides a cloud-based connected and reporting compliance platform that enables the use of connected data and automation of reporting across finance, accounting, risk, and compliance.
IMAX vs WK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $238.9M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $11.8M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | 19.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | 234.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $238.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $215.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $206.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $199.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $185.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $175.7M |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $-11.7M |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | 80.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | 79.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | 77.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | 76.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | 76.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | 76.4% |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | -12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | -11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | -10.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -9.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $338.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $-5.4M |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $338.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $315.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $242.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $301.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $248.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $267.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $296.1M |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $-36.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $-66.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $-75.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $-41.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $-50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $-77.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $-83.2M |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $51.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | $50.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | 21.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | 4.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | $138.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $46.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $-14.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $24.8M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $50.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $-122.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | $24.6M |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | 14.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | 4.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 16.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
WK
| License And Service | $219.3M | 92% |
| XBRL Professional Services | $16.4M | 7% |
| Other Services | $3.2M | 1% |
