vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INDEPENDENT BANK CORP (INDB) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $212.5M, roughly 1.2× INDEPENDENT BANK CORP). INDEPENDENT BANK CORP runs the higher net margin — 35.5% vs -125.2%, a 160.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. INDEPENDENT BANK CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($75.5M vs $-256.6M).
Independent Bank is a bank headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The bank has 62 branches, all of which are in Michigan.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
INDB vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $212.5M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $75.3M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 35.5% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 46.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.51 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $212.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.5M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $137.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $137.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.3% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.5% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.18 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.21 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $24.9B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $24.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.3B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $78.9M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $75.5M | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 35.5% | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.05× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $239.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $78.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $75.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3M | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.07× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INDB
Segment breakdown not available.
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
