vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INNEOVA Holdings Ltd (INEO) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INNEOVA Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.8M vs $20.2M, roughly 1.5× La Rosa Holdings Corp.). INNEOVA Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.8% vs -27.4%, a 28.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
V. La Rosa and Sons Macaroni Company was founded in 1914 by Vincenzo La Rosa, a Sicilian immigrant. The company eventually became one of the largest regional brands in the United States producing over 40 varieties of pasta.
INEO vs LRHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.8M | $20.2M |
| Net Profit | $243.0K | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 19.3% | 8.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | -24.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.8% | -27.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -125.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-5.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $6.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $243.0K | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-95.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-343.8K |
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 8.5% |
| Q3 25 | — | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -35.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -6.1% |
| Q3 25 | — | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 337.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -546.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -35.1% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -5.1% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $15.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $28.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.1M | $4.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.9M | $642.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.2M | $1.6M |
| Total Assets | $52.6M | $21.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.26× | 0.41× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $350.3K |
| Q3 25 | — | $642.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $644.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $645.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $647.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $649.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $650.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $652.4K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $722.5K |
| Q3 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.6M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $5.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.26× | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-301.0K | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.24× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-301.0K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-591.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-803.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-538.3K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.24× | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INEO
Segment breakdown not available.
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |