vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INSEEGO CORP. (INSG) and LandBridge Co LLC (LB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LandBridge Co LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.8M vs $48.4M, roughly 1.2× INSEEGO CORP.). LandBridge Co LLC runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs 1.0%, a 13.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LandBridge Co LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (55.6% vs 0.6%). LandBridge Co LLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.0M vs $11.6M). Over the past eight quarters, LandBridge Co LLC's revenue compounded faster (72.8% CAGR vs 13.6%).
Inseego Corp designs, manufactures and delivers advanced 5G and IoT solutions including mobile hotspots, edge computing devices, and cloud-based device management platforms. It primarily serves telecom operators, enterprise clients, and public sector customers across global markets.
INSG vs LB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $48.4M | $56.8M |
| Net Profit | $469.0K | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 42.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | 60.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.0% | 14.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.6% | 55.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 182.9% | -83.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $48.4M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.2M | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.7M | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.1M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.0M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.6M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.5M | $19.0M |
| Q4 25 | $469.0K | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $507.0K | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-566.0K | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $624.0K | $-57.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.5M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 60.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 49.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | -197.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.9% | 71.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | 135.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | -222.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.9% | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.44 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $24.9M | $30.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-4.0M | $340.3M |
| Total Assets | $93.8M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.68× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $24.9M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.1M | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.6M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $366.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $370.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $375.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $385.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $360.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-4.0M | $340.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.7M | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.5M | $266.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.0M | $217.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.9M | $211.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-85.1M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-101.8M | $296.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-105.6M | $162.3M |
| Q4 25 | $93.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.4M | $689.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.6M | $710.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.0M | $126.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.6M | $122.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.0% | 214.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 7.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 25.50× | 15.68× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.5M | $207.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.0M | $126.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.5M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.2M | $67.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | $122.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.7M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.3M | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | 214.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 66.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.6% | 75.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.0% | 36.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.7% | 182.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.5% | 60.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 90.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 25.50× | 15.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.22× | 4.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.81× | 4.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.65× | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
