vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($226.2M vs $219.1M, roughly 1.0× Iridium Communications Inc.). Iridium Communications Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 0.1%, a 9.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Iridium Communications Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.9% vs -10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Iridium Communications Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs -0.4%).
Iridium Communications Inc. is a publicly traded American company headquartered in McLean, Virginia, United States. Iridium operates the Iridium satellite constellation, a system of 80 satellites: 66 are active satellites and the remaining fourteen function as in-orbit spares. Iridium Satellites are used for worldwide voice and data communication from handheld satellite phones, satellite messenger communication devices and integrated transceivers, as well as for two-way satellite messaging se...
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
IRDM vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $219.1M | $226.2M |
| Net Profit | $21.6M | $180.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.9% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -74.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $219.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $212.9M | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $226.9M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.9M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.9M | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.0M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.8M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $201.1M | $212.9M |
| Q1 26 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.9M | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.1M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.0M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.4M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $10.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.1% |
| Q1 26 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | 8.4% |
| Q1 26 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 4.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.24 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.30 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | $0.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $158.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | — | $742.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.5M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.5M | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.3M | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.9M | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.5M | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $159.6M | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.5M | $332.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $462.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $450.5M | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $473.6M | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $518.4M | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $576.6M | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $663.8M | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $786.7M | $512.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $631.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IRDM
| Voice and data | $57.4M | 26% |
| IoT data (2) | $46.0M | 21% |
| Government | $39.5M | 18% |
| Government service revenue (5) | $27.6M | 13% |
| Subscriber equipment | $20.2M | 9% |
| Hosted payload and other data service (4) | $14.8M | 7% |
| Broadband (3) | $12.2M | 6% |
| Commercial | $1.3M | 1% |
USNA
Segment breakdown not available.
