vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Investar Holding Corp (ISTR) and Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Investar Holding Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.5M vs $17.3M, roughly 1.4× Valens Semiconductor Ltd.). On growth, Valens Semiconductor Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 0.9%).
Investar Holding Corp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company that primarily operates across the Gulf Coast region. It delivers a full range of commercial and retail banking services, including deposit products, consumer and business loans, mortgage services, and wealth management solutions for individual clients, small and medium-sized enterprises, and commercial entities.
Valens Semiconductor (Valens) is an Israeli fabless manufacturing company providing semiconductors for the automotive and audio-video industries. Valens provides semiconductor products for the distribution of uncompressed ultra-high-definition (UHD) multimedia content and in-vehicle connectivity applications. The company is a member of the MIPI Alliance and developed the first-to-market chipset that is compliant with the MIPI A-PHY standard. Valens invented the technology behind the HDBaseT s...
ISTR vs VLN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.5M | $17.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $-7.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 63.0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.9% | -46.4% |
| Net Margin | — | -42.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.9% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 29.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.1M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.3M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.0M | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.4M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 63.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | -46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.4% | -43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.2% | -56.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | -76.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | -69.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.6% | -42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | -42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | -49.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.1% | -64.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.9% | -65.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.54 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.46 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.63 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.61 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.48 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $93.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $301.1M | $108.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $136.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $93.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $102.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $112.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $105.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $301.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $295.3M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.9M | $116.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.7M | $128.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $245.5M | $147.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.2M | $153.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $227.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $136.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $144.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $154.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $171.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $175.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | $-4.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -28.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-11.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $-211.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-225.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-330.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-460.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -47.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.66× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
