vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP) and LandBridge Co LLC (LB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LandBridge Co LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.0M vs $25.6M, roughly 2.0× IT TECH PACKAGING, INC.). LandBridge Co LLC runs the higher net margin — 35.0% vs -5.7%, a 40.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LandBridge Co LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.0% vs 2.1%). LandBridge Co LLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($40.9M vs $1.5M). Over the past eight quarters, LandBridge Co LLC's revenue compounded faster (40.2% CAGR vs 10.5%).

IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.

ITP vs LB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LB
LB
2.0× larger
LB
$51.0M
$25.6M
ITP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LB
LB
+14.0% gap
LB
16.0%
2.1%
ITP
Higher net margin
LB
LB
40.7% more per $
LB
35.0%
-5.7%
ITP
More free cash flow
LB
LB
$39.4M more FCF
LB
$40.9M
$1.5M
ITP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LB
LB
Annualised
LB
40.2%
10.5%
ITP

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Revenue
$25.6M
$51.0M
Net Profit
$-1.4M
$17.9M
Gross Margin
7.9%
Operating Margin
-3.9%
57.2%
Net Margin
-5.7%
35.0%
Revenue YoY
2.1%
16.0%
Net Profit YoY
26.6%
15.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.11

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
$51.0M
Q4 25
$56.8M
Q3 25
$25.6M
$50.8M
Q2 25
$24.8M
$47.5M
Q1 25
$10.9M
$44.0M
Q4 24
$17.6M
$36.5M
Q3 24
$25.1M
$28.5M
Q2 24
$26.2M
$26.0M
Net Profit
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
$17.9M
Q4 25
$8.1M
Q3 25
$-1.4M
$8.1M
Q2 25
$-2.0M
$7.5M
Q1 25
$-3.5M
$6.5M
Q4 24
$-4.0M
$49.3M
Q3 24
$-2.0M
$2.7M
Q2 24
$-77.7K
$-57.7M
Gross Margin
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
7.9%
Q2 25
5.1%
Q1 25
0.8%
Q4 24
6.3%
Q3 24
7.6%
Q2 24
12.4%
Operating Margin
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
57.2%
Q4 25
60.0%
Q3 25
-3.9%
60.8%
Q2 25
-7.1%
60.0%
Q1 25
-31.0%
57.0%
Q4 24
-21.5%
49.4%
Q3 24
-5.8%
11.2%
Q2 24
2.1%
-197.4%
Net Margin
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
35.0%
Q4 25
14.2%
Q3 25
-5.7%
15.9%
Q2 25
-7.9%
15.8%
Q1 25
-32.2%
14.7%
Q4 24
-22.9%
135.2%
Q3 24
-7.9%
9.3%
Q2 24
-0.3%
-222.1%
EPS (diluted)
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.24
Q3 25
$-0.11
$0.26
Q2 25
$-0.16
$0.24
Q1 25
$-0.35
$0.20
Q4 24
$-0.40
Q3 24
$-0.20
$-0.04
Q2 24
$-0.01

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$29.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.7M
$433.0K
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$152.0M
Total Assets
$175.7M
$1.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.03×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
$29.7M
Q4 25
$30.7M
Q3 25
$28.3M
Q2 25
$20.3M
Q1 25
$14.9M
Q4 24
$37.0M
Q3 24
$14.4M
Q2 24
$24.6M
Total Debt
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
$433.0K
Q4 25
$570.7M
Q3 25
$4.7M
$366.1M
Q2 25
$4.7M
$370.9M
Q1 25
$4.7M
$375.5M
Q4 24
$4.7M
$385.5M
Q3 24
$8.9M
$242.4M
Q2 24
$11.3M
$360.8M
Stockholders' Equity
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$340.3M
Q3 25
$152.0M
$272.0M
Q2 25
$152.3M
$266.4M
Q1 25
$152.8M
$217.0M
Q4 24
$156.1M
$211.8M
Q3 24
$164.3M
$97.2M
Q2 24
$163.5M
$296.4M
Total Assets
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
$1.4B
Q4 25
$1.4B
Q3 25
$175.7M
$1.1B
Q2 25
$175.2M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$175.2M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$177.5M
$1.0B
Q3 24
$190.0M
$689.9M
Q2 24
$191.4M
$710.5M
Debt / Equity
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.68×
Q3 25
0.03×
1.35×
Q2 25
0.03×
1.39×
Q1 25
0.03×
1.73×
Q4 24
0.03×
1.82×
Q3 24
0.05×
2.49×
Q2 24
0.07×
1.22×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.5M
$41.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.5M
$40.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
5.9%
80.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.30×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$3.8M
$232.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
$41.1M
Q4 25
$126.3M
Q3 25
$1.5M
$34.9M
Q2 25
$1.4M
$37.3M
Q1 25
$-2.5M
$15.9M
Q4 24
$3.5M
$67.6M
Q3 24
$1.5M
$7.5M
Q2 24
$721.9K
$16.0M
Free Cash Flow
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
$40.9M
Q4 25
$122.0M
Q3 25
$1.5M
$33.7M
Q2 25
$1.3M
$36.1M
Q1 25
$-2.5M
$15.8M
Q4 24
$3.5M
$66.7M
Q3 24
$1.2M
$7.1M
Q2 24
$668.3K
$15.7M
FCF Margin
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
80.3%
Q4 25
214.9%
Q3 25
5.9%
66.3%
Q2 25
5.4%
75.9%
Q1 25
-22.8%
36.0%
Q4 24
19.6%
182.6%
Q3 24
4.9%
25.1%
Q2 24
2.5%
60.4%
Capex Intensity
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
7.5%
Q3 25
0.0%
2.3%
Q2 25
0.1%
2.6%
Q1 25
0.1%
0.2%
Q4 24
0.1%
2.7%
Q3 24
1.0%
1.1%
Q2 24
0.2%
1.4%
Cash Conversion
ITP
ITP
LB
LB
Q1 26
2.30×
Q4 25
15.68×
Q3 25
4.31×
Q2 25
4.98×
Q1 25
2.46×
Q4 24
1.37×
Q3 24
2.80×
Q2 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ITP
ITP

Segment breakdown not available.

LB
LB

Other$14.2M28%
Easements and other surface-related revenues$11.6M23%
Surface use royalties - related party$11.0M22%
Resource sales$5.2M10%
Resource royalties$4.3M8%
Easements and other surface-related revenues - related party$3.2M6%
Resource royalties - related party$1.3M2%
Resource sales - related party$205.0K0%

Related Comparisons