vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.6M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.9× Laird Superfood, Inc.). IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. runs the higher net margin — -5.7% vs -13.2%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 10.5%).
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
ITP vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.6M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | -5.7% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.1% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.6% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.6M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.8M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.1M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.0M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-77.7K | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.7M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.9% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.1% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.5% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -51.0% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.7% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.9% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.2% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.9% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.3% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.6% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $152.0M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $175.7M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.0M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.3M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.3M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $164.3M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.7M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $175.2M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $175.2M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $177.5M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.0M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $191.4M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $177.5M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $721.9K | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $624.4K | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $668.3K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $615.4K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ITP
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
