vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and NACCO INDUSTRIES INC (NC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JBG SMITH Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($127.6M vs $66.8M, roughly 1.9× NACCO INDUSTRIES INC). NACCO INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — -5.8% vs -35.7%, a 30.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBG SMITH Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.5% vs -5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, NACCO INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (11.9% CAGR vs -6.3%).
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
NACCO Industries, Inc. is an American publicly traded holding company, headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio. Through a portfolio of mining and natural resources businesses, the company operates under three business segments: Coal Mining, North American Mining, and Minerals Management. The Coal Mining segment operates surface coal mines under long-term contracts with power generation companies and an activated carbon producer pursuant to a service-based business model. The North American Mining se...
JBGS vs NC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $66.8M |
| Net Profit | $-45.5M | $-3.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | 11.3% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | -5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | -5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.0% | -150.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $-0.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | $66.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | $76.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | $68.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $65.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | $70.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $61.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $52.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.2M | $53.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.3M | $4.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.1% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | -5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.2% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $1.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $0.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $0.66 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $2.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.36 | $0.61 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $75.3M | $49.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $100.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $429.2M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $661.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | $52.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $49.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $61.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | $72.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | $63.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | $62.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.5M | $61.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $100.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $99.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $28.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $429.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $426.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $413.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $409.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $404.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $397.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $384.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $381.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $661.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $637.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $631.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $634.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $631.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $597.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $560.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $538.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.3M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $42.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | $25.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.0M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBGS
Segment breakdown not available.
NC
| Transferred Over Time | $42.7M | 64% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $24.1M | 36% |
